Last week I wrote a pretty harsh post about Harry Potter, and was relieved that others too think the Boy Who Lived should finally die.
When in the cinema to see the new Fantastic Beasts, it actually did feel like Harry Potter was dying. We went the day after the release, and the theatre was almost empty. When I was growing up every showing was packed for the first week at least. It was a sad realisation. I also felt really old that the kids that were there weren’t even alive when Harry Potter first came out.
To the review:
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is the sequel to Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them which followed magizoologist Newt Scamander to New York on the look out for fantastic beasts for his book, and a secret mission Dumbledore sent him on.
The second film sees Newt go to Paris to track down the obscurus, Credence, and stop him from joining the wrong side; Grindelwald’s.
Grindelwald’s been a much anticipated character – although people aren’t happy with the casting. Although not physically present in the Harry Potter books and movies, we learn that he was a close friend to Dumbledore as a teenager. Both wanted to see wizard come out of hiding. Dumbledore, of course, had a change of heart. A fight between the two resulted in the death of Dumbledore’s sister, Ariana, and neither knew who cast the curse who killed her. Grindlewald’s presence in the series means we might finally find out who killed Ariana.
What fans seem to be the most eager about is the acknowledgment of Dumbledore’s sexuality as he was in love with Grindlewald. In short: Grindlewald being here is a big deal.
Yet they blew it.
Grindlewald is hyped up to the most evil wizard before Voldermort, “wizard Hitler” as he’s commonly called online. Yet, he didn’t seem that bad. While I get that he’s lying, manipulating people, and using his charm, so far, he doesn’t seem that bad. This movie could have been a dark tale about all the evil he’s done, and it wasn’t.
If you’re not invested in the Harry Potter world you’ll like this movie. It has a decent plot and story. When I ignored everything I know about the Wizarding World I could enjoy it.
Newt’s become one of my favourite characters in the whole franchise. I also think that Erza Miller is doing so great as Credence. I think the cast deserve better than what they’re getting.
They actually broke cannon. They included Professor McGonagall to add more Harry Potter nostalgia to the story. The film is set in 1927, and she told Umbridge in the books that she didn’t start teaching in Hogwarts until the 1950s. She wouldn’t have been born by 1927. They actually took the year she was born off of Pottermore to try hide the mistake.
They really tried hard with the Harry Potter nostaglica. Nicolas Flamel briefly featured, and added nothing to the plot. Nor was there actually much of a reason for them to go to Hogwarts. Again, they wanted to remind us that this is a Harry Potter film, like we didn’t already know.
Some of the character developments since the first movie seemed off as well, especially Queenie. The usual meticulous attention to detail is gone.
You could argue this was a rushed cash grab. Three more movies is a big risk so they next 3 really need to up their game – especially if they plan on keeping Johnny Depp because lord knows his reign as Hollywood’s leading man is coming to an end. A lot of fans boycotted the movie because of him.
Crimes of Grindelwald actually exceeded my expectations, but I still stand by what I said in my last post. Please let this series be the end.
0 thoughts on “What I thought of The Crimes of Grindelwald”
I’ll be honest I quite liked it. It was an improvement on the first movie, and the adult cast in my opinion is the natural progression for those who grew up the teenage potter stories. I will happily sit through three more.
Thank you for this review! I used to be a huge Harry Potter fan, but I haven’t seen the new movies.
I couldn’t agree with this review more- I enjoyed it much more than the first and the inclusion of Hogwards and the whomping willows etc really made it much more magical and linked to the Harry Potter films. We went on the day after the release and the theatre was packed so it’s sad to hear that yours was empty but at least you had your pick of seats!
Soph – https://sophhearts.com x
I’m not a very big Harry Potter fan and haven’t seen Fantastic Beasts at all so a lot of this went over my head but I’m glad it exceeded your expectations even if you’re not a fan of the series x
I have to say I really liked this movie, much more than the first. I probably will happily sit through the other three movies. I’m glad to hear you liked it too though 🙂 xx
Melina | http://www.melinaelisa.com
I enjoyed the Crimes of Grindelwald; it is definitely different from J.K Rowling’s other books, being more lighthearted. It has good world-building in terms of animals, and I did enjoy the suitcase to another world. 🙂
That said, I am not dying for a third one.